When the escalator question was put to us a short while ago, we took time to scout around and see what was already available in one form or another. But what we found didn’t really float our collective boat. We certainly saw some very pretty models, make no mistake about it, but they were lacking something… Steps for one, along with the point and click ease which we rely on so often and almost take for granted in the program we all hate to love: Revit.

So we gathered round the table, coffee or tea in hand, depending on national preference, and asked ourselves: What would we want from an escalator family? To which we replied:

  - Automatic sizing between levels
  - Steps

Doesn’t seem like too much to ask, right?

Not so fast. Getting a model, one built in a Mechanical Equipment Template, to auto-connect between floors is easier said than done. So we searched for a while, and finally found a template that auto-leveled. We did a few tests, and realized that it could work. There were a few false starts, however, as we discovered that putting any kind of dimension in between the levels completely negated the template’s auto-leveling abilities. So we made the top and bottom landings on their appropriate planes, and had the rising structure of the escalator as a sweep, locked at an angle to the horizontal plane, with the end points of its path locked to the two levels. Worked like a charm.

Next came the introduction of the steps. In previous escalator models, we had access to the vertical distance between levels and the horizontal length of the model as family parameters, which made step numbers and placement a simple application of your old friend Pythagoras’ theorem. Alas, in the all-singing-all-dancing auto-leveler, we didn’t have access to any of the lengths - horizontal, vertical or diagonal. Why not? Because just like with the space between levels, attaching dimensions to any one of the lengths broke the automation.

Again, there was much discussion and drinking of hot beverages.

Then a member of our team had an epiphany: There is one type of family that doesn’t need a length dimension. If you just click and draw a line, the family repeats itself along it ad infinitum. The Generic Line Based Family! This led to some preemptive rejoicing, as we ended up having to re-build and re-nest the Line Based family a number of times to actually get the thing to work.

In our first attempt, we thought we were being clever and seeing problems before they occurred. We said to ourselves, “If the line is going to follow the rising sweep of the escalator, and we build the steps flat… they’ll make a segmented slide, and we don’t want that!” So we built the steps at an angle with the tread of each step 30° from the horizontal, from the path of the Line Based Model. Didn’t work.

Looking back, a little pre-testing should have been done. The steps were indeed at an angle, but in a line stretching horizontally from the base of the escalator backwards, into the distance, and never rising from that plane. Apparently, the Generic Line Based model’s path doesn’t like being hosted on geometry, and without any major planes built between levels, there was nowhere other than lower level plane to draw it.

We needed a quick re-think, again. This time around we found our answer, one that now seems almost obvious. We built the steps rising from the path in the Nested Generic Line based model. “Of Course,” we said, slapping out foreheads at the simple logic of it all. From there, we nested the family’s reference planes in place, and it was all-systems-go. Buy & Download this Revit Escalator Family.

Jonathan Lloyd
BIM Modeler

We recently received a request to model the Artis Zee Biplane System, and quickly discovered this was not your run of the mill Revit family. Made by Siemens, the Artis Zee Biplane is a cutting-edge, robotic, medical diagnostic device consisting of a bed, a display arm, a ceiling mounted C-arm, and a base C-arm. The arms, or Zees, as Siemens calls them, are each made up of multiple pieces that rotate or spin along different axes, which allows for tremendous freedom of movement. The bed can also rotate around three axes. And of course our client wanted the ability to freely arrange each element’s position. So we’re talking parameters, parameters, and…more parameters.

“Congrats to you and your team for making such a complex model. The manual is also incredibly helpful for understanding how the parameters have been set up.”

Luckily for us, we have an outstanding team of modelers that more than rose to the occasion. They built the system as one family with four nested files. Since the requirements were to make the Zee system fully movable while still looking great rendered, small file size wasn’t a priority for the client. We first modeled the reference lines laced with their appropriate parameters to act as an “armature” for the geometric model.

The main obstacle during the modeling process proved to be the Zees’ electrical conduits, which were supposed to hang freely depending on the movement of the arms. Making smooth curved geometries that change shape through parameters does tend to be difficult in Revit. More so when those changes are angular rather than linear. After some brainstorming, followed by some trial and error, it was decided that to ensure problem-free movement, the cables should have limited movement; they would stay beside their corresponding arms to avoid parameter errors.

Once the separate families were ready (Zee arms and display arm), they were nested inside the bed family. Their parameters were then linked and materials assigned, completing the family for delivery to the client.

The process of building a complex family like the Zee reinforces some basic principles of successful modeling:

1. Make sure you create families on the right plane

2. Name the reference planes explicitly

3. Flex, flex, and flex again

With its multiple free-moving parts, the Artis Zee Biplane was certainly a family more challenging than most. But in the end our modelers really shined and we came away quite happy with the results. This request gave us the chance to experiment with some new techniques, and to create what we feel is a truly beautiful Revit family.

Cristobal Bernal
Project Manager

Okay, let’s say you buy the Family Pack 50. That means your account gets credited with a license to order and download up to 50 Revit families from Broutek. I say “order and download” because you’re not limited to the families already in our library. If we don’t have a family you need, you simply submit your request and we build the family for you at no extra charge, usually within 48 hours.

But the real value of our packs is in their fixed pricing per family, which can add up to huge savings over buying families one at a time. Using the 50 Pack as an example again, our current price of $2,400 breaks down to $48 per family. That’s about 33% less expensive than almost any individual family you can find in our Library. If you purchased our largest Family Pack of 500, you’d be saving roughly 70% per family. And your Family Pack never expires, so you don’t have to worry about whether you’ll need new families today, next week, or next month. Packs are perfect for longer-term projects, firms with full-time Revit teams, in fact pretty much anyone who will be working in Revit on a regular basis.

Our goal at Broutek is to provide customers with fast, flexible and affordable access to high-quality content, so you can use Revit instead of making Revit. I think our Family Packs are a great step in that direction, and I hope I’ve convinced you to give them a try. If not, then I hope at least you’re not still scratching your head about them!

Jose Fandos
CTO Broutek Ltd

In the year to come, we aim to continue improving our service — the breadth of families available from our library, the turnaround time for filling family requests, and the ease of using our site. We will also be working on providing visitors with additional resources on Revit and BIM, as well as incorporating customer reviews of content. It is our hope that Broutek can help make your 2008 a little less stressful, and quite a bit more productive. We look forward to being in touch and continuing to serve all of your Revit content needs.

On behalf of the Broutek Team, I wish you a prosperous 2008.

Jose Fandos
CTO Broutek Ltd

You’ll find us at booth 524 in the exhibit hall, where Managing Director, Chris Milford, and Chief Technology Officer, Jose Fandos, will be on-hand to answer questions and share their enthusiasm about the future of Broutek and BIM. We look forward to seeing you there!

-The Broutek Team

As always, we welcome your questions and comments. So drop us a line and tell us what you think.

Until next time,

The Broutek Team

On the subject of content, we now have approximately 320 families developed/uploaded/under QA (Hattersley, TA, George Fischer, Grundfos, Wilo, McQuay and others.) So far, we have uploaded short of 160 families to the website. We have also completely developed the Vitaulic family range, including pipework, fittings and flanged connectors to flanged fittings - and this is now fully operational within Revit.

This comes at a perfect time as we are readying our collection of Revit BIM Parts, a library of UK specific Revit content. We are focused on supporting both Autodesk AutoCAD MEP and Autodesk Revit MEP.

In the coming days I’ll be posting questions regarding UK specific MEP requirements and standards. Keep tuned.

On the 25th of May 4BIM.com wrote about us on their blog. Shortly after showing up there, we started receiving phone calls. After the bank holiday weekend we were in Google. And now there is a small but steady flow of emails and phone calls. Can’t say it’s not been good for us.

4BIM.com is a website focused on BIM related news. The site is edited by Miles Walker, BIM evangelist and CAD Manager for HOK - Miles, if you read this, a big thank you!

The site is a great resource to keep updated on BIM, architecture, software and related events. Among its many news and bits, there is one item in particular worth highlighting – A gold nugget in the form of HOK CAD Standards and a must read for any CAD Manager. One can only hope that sharing one’s CAD Standards becomes commonplace in the industry. Personally, I believe that it is the best way to get the industry to anything close to a general standard.

And the best part? The HOK CAD Standards available for download include BIM Standards.

Go get them right away!